What Aslan Tells Us About Dualism, Pantheism and the Problem of Evil

May 15, 2009 at 2:45 pm 4 comments

This continues my last post.

Aslan and White Witch

I raise my hand for the next blow: Aslan is not the good guy in a drama of good and evil fighting one another on equal terms. Such a view is called dualism, to which, in order to refute it, Lewis devoted several pages in his Mere Christianity.

There he mentions that he personally thought dualism to be a very manly and sensible creed, but he realized there was a catch in it. The catch is this. If the universe exists of two independent powers of good and evil, who then is the judge between them that decides which one is good and which one evil? Human beings, perhaps? But we are dependant on them and cannot therefore be their judge. You cannot judge a thing from “below.” If fish could talk, they would judge all fishermen to be evil and all human beings of other professions good, but that would hardly be a judgment with which we agreed. Clearly the Judge of these two forces has to be on a higher plane than either of them, and both have to be accountable to Him.

That, however, would lead us away from dualism and into the world of monotheism. Changing the analogy, we can picture the universe of dualism like two boxers fighting each other—but without a referee. And if there is no referee, each boxer can decide for himself what is and is not fair play. Each one can therefore consider himself being the good guy fighting the bad guy. And then we can just as well drop the whole idea of good and evil, and with it, drop the idea of two truly opposite forces fighting at all.

It follows that Aslan and the evil Witch are not equal opponents. The Witch is nothing more than a pathetic rebel against the sovereign Lion, merely one of his creatures who chose wrong over right.

This is well illustrated by an incident in The Magician’s Nephew. There, the Witch flings an iron bar at Aslan’s head, but it has no effect on him whatsoever. It strikes him between the eyes, glances off and falls with a thud into the grass, and the Lion keeps on walking—“neither faster nor slower than before.”

However, only because Aslan is not a “boxer” in a dualistic universe, it does not follow that he is “everything,” as pantheists would have it. He is not both the cancer and the healer, both life and death, creator and destroyer.

When Digory’s mother lies sick in bed, Aslan has “great shining tears” in his eyes. A pantheist would tell Aslan, “If you could but see it from God’s perspective, you would know that the sickness, too, is God.” But Aslan is God, and yet he cries. That is profound. Apparently he endowed some of his creatures with such a power of choice that their choices can grieve him, and yet he is not angry at God (meaning himself) for having “allowed” such evil to exist.

About these ads

Entry filed under: C. S. Lewis, Critique of Religion, Philosophy. Tags: , , , , , , , , , .

The Religion of the Force (and of the Great Cosmic Emptiness) Angels & Demons: Science & Religion?

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. kerry emmerson  |  February 21, 2011 at 11:50 am

    I find this a little confusing and onesided. For a start you claim that a dualist believes a,
    “universe exists of two independent powers of good and evil”.
    Good and evil are a completely different pair of comparisons to be used in something other than deciding whether one is a dualist or not. Who wrote this has twisted things around to suit a story of their own in what appears to me, to try and baffle or trick the reader into thinking along a different path.

  • 2. jacobschriftman  |  February 21, 2011 at 12:28 pm

    Thanks for your comment, Kerry. I wasn’t talking about Cartesian dualism in this post, which is what you seem to be thinking of (?), but the cosmic dualism that you find in religions such as Zoroastrianism. Sorry for not stating this more clearly; I thought it was implicit from the context. Dualism is quite a general term that simply denotes something consisting of two parts. It is used widely in various fields of discourse.
    Also, this is not meant to be a balanced treatment of the truth claims of any particular view, but merely an explication of the Christian worldview that underlies the Chronicles of Narnia.
    Cheers,
    Jacob

  • 3. jacobschriftman  |  February 21, 2011 at 1:09 pm

    Here are three Wikipedia articles that clarify the various uses of the word “dualism”:
    Dualism in general: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism
    Cosmic dualism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualistic_cosmology
    Cartesian dualism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism_(philosophy_of_mind)

  • 4. walking dead t shirts  |  April 12, 2013 at 12:04 pm

    Pretty component to content. I simply stumbled upon your website and
    in accession capital to say that I get in fact loved account your weblog posts.
    Anyway I will be subscribing on your feeds or even I fulfillment you get admission to persistently rapidly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Feeds

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 157 other followers

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

May 2009
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 157 other followers

%d bloggers like this: